The “drug dealers” he’s talking about are Cartel members who aid in human tracking and the murder of thousands of people each year.
First, you’re not the Trump whisperer. What is it with you Faketriots and your constant…“he meant this…?”.
Secondly, you’re showing your hand…in this country, the one you despise, we have a Constitution. We have rule of law. We have due process. Time and time again, you show you abhor our Constitution, our laws, and our country in general.
Nothing you wrote lent anything to the conversation except proving the point. The enemies of our country are you, as you hold our country and our Constitution with little but contempt.
This is what’s called fascism
“Donald Trump ended his pre-midterm rally blitz in disgusting fashion, calling House Speaker Nancy Pelosi “an animal,” championing the death penalty, and giddily imagining the prison rape of the journalist who reported on the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade,” Rolling Stone reported. “The rally on Monday wasn’t the first time Trump imagined journalists being raped in prison. He laid out the same fantasy at a rally in Texas last month, saying the reporter would give up the identity of the leaker as soon as they realize they are ‘going to be the bride of another prisoner very shortly.’ The audience burst out in laughter, just as they did Monday night in Ohio.”
Cartel members aren’t US citizens. The US constitution doesn’t apply to them.
So this means they should have 2 hour trials? Doubt it.
Someone tweet snowflake Amanda to reel it in
It’s desperation time for the Left. You can see they are in panic mode.
The fact that they are trying to make this about Trump even though he isn’t on the ballot is a telling sign.
I think they know they are screwed in a lot of races today.
First, you’re making the context up. He said “drug dealers”, not foreign national cartel members. You can’t seem to go three sentences without being dishonest. Secondly, courts have routinely confirmed throughout history that anyone on our soil is subject to our laws, which includes due process. How much due process has been miffed about, but at no point did anyone state we had legal right to murder people we suspect of being drug dealers and then mail the bullets to their families.
What an interesting thing, considering HE PARDONED DRUG DEALERS.
It’s a remarkable response, though, it really is. I wonder how you, even you, square that response with your religion.
If I suspect your wife is a drug dealer, am I justified in shooting her in the face? Trump didn’t say anything about cartels. You did. He said drug dealers. You defended it. So…what if I think your kid is selling weed? So, you think I should have the right to slaughter your entire family if I think they’re selling drugs?
Under Biden, it is the Mexican cartels that control our immigration. Small wonder the Border Patrol overwhelmingly supports Trump. Biden fails at everything whereas Trump made promises before being elected and then kept his promises. Not only is Biden destroying America but Europe as well. Never thought Biden could be worse than Obama, but never say never.
Really? Did that wall ever get finished?
Was the wall a good idea? How’s immigration doing now under Biden? Why does the Border Patrol like the wall idea?
There were hundreds of lawsuits filed by liberals that delayed the wall completion, and Trump nearly completed it and would have completed it had there not been a rigged election. Trump’s achievements in four years were miraculous. Even the Black Colleges prospered under Trump who supported them when Obama did NOT.
That wasn’t my question. You said Trump fulfilled all his promises. So I ask again: did that wall get done?
It’s a yes or no question.
Okay, the answer is no due entirely to a rigged election. Clearly, without the election swindle, Trump would have completed the wall as promised.
I’m still waiting for you to provide proof.
It’s been 2 years now.
You really have to be not only the dumbest person on the board but also the most arrogant as you lean in. Trump references China’s laws correct? So we have a reference point. Right?
Ok- we’ll China’s capital punishment laws are for drug traffickers- not simple drug dealers.
These laws are designed for the big cartels that smuggle in drugs in large amounts. Not for recreational drug users or simple drug dealers.
Trump’s language is sometimes not specific. I’m positive that if he’s pressed on this issue he’ll say exactly what I’m saying. He’ll talk about how violent they are and how they’re smuggling in drugs and killing people.
“Being subject to laws” is not the same as “conferring rights”
I can be convicted of a crime as an illegal but it doesn’t necessarily mean I have the same identical rights as an American citizen.
The constitution specifically mentions rights that are only granted to citizens. 1 obvious example is voting rights. Are you going to tell me that illegals have the right to vote?
But furthermore we’re talking about a penal code amendment (sentencing guidelines for capital punishment)…. There’s nothing unconstitutional about amending the penalties for cartels and their smugglers to include the death penalty. If there is- flesh it out for me.
Surely those individuals if captured on American soil will receive due process but why couldn’t we give them the death penalty?
Your statement never really made sense. And I was simply making a broader point to you that not all constitutional protections are afforded to non-citizens. It depends how the constitution reads (citizen vs person vs etc)…
What? Because I’m religious I can’t be for Capital Punishment? Is that your theory?
“The wages of sin is death.”
God has his own penal code and it includes Capital Punishment.
Moreover, Pope John Paul stated:
Assuming that the guilty party’s identity and responsibility have been fully determined, the traditional teaching of the Church does not exclude recourse to the death penalty, if this is the only possible way of effectively defending human lives against the unjust aggressor. . . .
Today, in fact, as a consequence of the possibilities which the state has for effectively preventing crime, by rendering one who has committed an offense incapable of doing harm – without definitely taking away from him the possibility of redeeming himself – the cases in which the execution of the offender is an absolute necessity “are very rare, if not practically nonexistent” (emphasis added; footnote omitted)
And he wonders why he is labeled a Trump Cum Guzzler…
Glad you can get excited about the cum